Nimitz Encounter (2004): U.S Navy & the The Tic Tac UFO

The Nimitz Tic Tac UFO/UAP Encounter

The Nimitz Encounter of 2004 stands as one of the most significant and well-documented cases of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) in modern history. Over several days in November 2004, multiple U.S. Navy personnel, including highly trained fighter pilots and radar operators, encountered and recorded objects that demonstrated flight characteristics far beyond known aviation technology.

This series of events, which occurred off the coast of Southern California, gained widespread public attention in 2017 when video footage of one of the encounters was released. The incident has since become a cornerstone in discussions about UAPs, challenging our understanding of aerospace capabilities and prompting serious consideration from military, scientific, and political circles.

The Nimitz Encounter is particularly noteworthy for several reasons:

1. Credibility of Witnesses: The observers were trained military personnel, including experienced fighter pilots and radar operators.
2. Multiple Sensors: The objects were tracked by sophisticated radar systems from both ships and aircraft, and visually observed by pilots. Additionally, infrared camera footage was captured.
3. Performance Characteristics: The reported maneuvers and speeds of the objects far exceeded known aircraft capabilities.
4. Duration: The encounters occurred over several days, ruling out many conventional explanations.
5. Official Acknowledgment: In an unprecedented move, the U.S. Navy has officially acknowledged the authenticity of the released videos and the reality of the encounters.

The significance of the Nimitz Encounter in UFO history cannot be overstated. It represents a paradigm shift in how UAP reports are perceived and investigated, both within military circles and in the public domain. The incident has played a crucial role in legitimizing the study of UAPs, leading to increased government interest, including the establishment of official UAP investigation programs.

Moreover, the Nimitz Encounter has had a profound impact on public discourse about UAPs. It has moved the conversation from the fringes of popular culture into mainstream scientific and political discussions. The event has been covered by reputable news organizations, analyzed by scientists, and has even been the subject of congressional briefings.

Key points:

• The Nimitz Encounter is one of the most significant and well-documented UAP cases in modern history
• It involved multiple credible military witnesses and sophisticated sensor data
• The incident has played a crucial role in legitimizing UAP studies and investigations
• It has had a significant impact on public discourse and government policy regarding UAPs

Historical and Operational Context

In November 2004, the United States was deeply engaged in the War on Terror, with military operations ongoing in both Afghanistan and Iraq. The U.S. Navy, as a critical component of America’s global force projection, was conducting regular training exercises to maintain readiness.

The USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group, at the center of this incident, was performing routine training exercises off the coast of Southern California. This area, known as the SOCAL (Southern California) training range, is a vast expanse of ocean regularly used by the Navy for various drills and exercises.

The Carrier Strike Group consisted of several vessels, including:

1. USS Nimitz (CVN-68): A nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, the flagship of the group.
2. USS Princeton (CG-59): A Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser, equipped with advanced SPY-1 radar system.
3. Several destroyer-class ships.
4. Support vessels and submarines.

The air wing aboard the USS Nimitz included F/A-18 Hornet and Super Hornet fighter jets, among other aircraft. These advanced multirole fighters were equipped with sophisticated sensor suites, including the ATFLIR (Advanced Targeting Forward-Looking Infrared) pod, which would play a crucial role in recording one of the UAPs.

In terms of technology, 2004 represented a period of significant advancement in military aviation and sensor capabilities:

1. Radar Systems: The Navy was using some of the most advanced radar systems in the world, including the SPY-1 Aegis system on the USS Princeton, capable of tracking multiple targets with high precision.
2. Aircraft Capabilities: The F/A-18s were state-of-the-art fighters, with advanced avionics and sensor packages.
3. Data Linking: The strike group utilized advanced data linking capabilities, allowing for real-time sharing of tactical information between ships and aircraft.
4. Satellite Communications: Global communications capabilities allowed for rapid reporting and analysis of unusual occurrences.

It’s important to note that this level of technology and the training of the personnel involved lend significant credibility to the observations made during the Nimitz Encounter. These were not amateur observers, but highly trained professionals using some of the most advanced sensor systems in the world.

The geopolitical context is also relevant. While the U.S. was not in a state of heightened alert in this specific area, the ongoing global conflicts meant that any unknown incursion into training areas would be taken very seriously. The post-9/11 environment had heightened awareness of potential threats, making the unidentified nature of these objects a matter of significant concern.

Key points:

• The Nimitz Encounter occurred during routine training exercises of a Carrier Strike Group
• The Navy was using highly advanced radar, aircraft, and sensor systems
• The geopolitical context of ongoing global conflicts added significance to any unknown incursions
• The technological capabilities and training of the personnel involved lend credibility to the observations

Timeline of Events

The Nimitz Encounter unfolded over several days in November 2004, with the most significant events occurring on November 14th. Here’s a chronological overview of the key events:

Early November 2004:

• The USS Princeton, using its advanced SPY-1 radar system, begins detecting unusual aerial objects. These objects appear at altitudes above 80,000 feet, far higher than conventional aircraft can operate.
• The radar contacts would descend rapidly, dropping from 80,000 feet to 20,000 feet in a matter of seconds, a maneuver impossible for known aircraft.
• Senior Chief Operations Specialist Kevin Day, responsible for the air defense systems, notes these anomalous radar tracks occurring daily for about two weeks.

November 14, 2004: Morning:

• The Princeton’s radar detects a large group of anomalous aerial contacts, estimated at about 100 miles southwest of San Diego.
• Two F/A-18F Super Hornets, piloted by Commander David Fravor and Lieutenant Commander Jim Slaight, are diverted from a routine training mission to investigate.

Approximately 2:00 PM:

• Fravor and Slaight arrive in the area and are directed to an empty patch of ocean by Princeton.
• They observe a disturbance in the water, described as resembling a calm sea amid rougher waters, approximately 50-100 meters in diameter.
• Above this disturbance, they see a white, oblong object, often described as “Tic Tac” shaped, approximately 30-46 feet in length.
• The object begins mirroring Fravor’s aircraft movements before suddenly and rapidly accelerating out of sight.

Shortly After:

• Another flight of F/A-18s is directed to the area.
• One of these aircraft, piloted by Lieutenant Chad Underwood, manages to capture infrared video footage of an object using the ATFLIR pod. This footage later becomes known as the “FLIR1” video.

Following Days:

• Further radar detections and possibly visual sightings continue to occur.
• The events are discussed among the crew, and initial reports are filed.

Key points:

• Unusual radar contacts were detected by the USS Princeton for about two weeks prior to the main incident
• The primary visual encounter occurred on November 14, 2004, involving Commander David Fravor and Lieutenant Commander Jim Slaight
• A second flight captured infrared footage of an object, which later became public as the “FLIR1” video
• The events occurred over several days, involving multiple sensors and witnesses

Key Witnesses and Their Accounts

The Nimitz Encounter involves several key witnesses whose testimonies form the core of this extraordinary event. Their accounts, given their military training and experience, lend significant credibility to the incident.

Commander David Fravor

Commander David Fravor, an experienced U.S. Navy pilot with 18 years of experience at the time, provides one of the most compelling eyewitness accounts of the Nimitz Encounter.

On November 14, 2004, Fravor was the commanding officer of the Black Aces squadron, flying an F/A-18F Super Hornet. His account of the events includes:

1. Initial Contact: Fravor and his wingman, Jim Slaight, were directed by the USS Princeton to investigate an unknown aerial contact.
2. Visual Sighting: Upon arriving at the designated location, Fravor observed a disturbance in the ocean, described as a cross-shaped or oval area of churning water about the size of a Boeing 737 airplane. Above this disturbance, he saw a white, oblong object, often described as “Tic Tac” shaped, approximately 30-46 feet in length.
3. Object’s Behavior: Fravor reported that the object seemed to mirror his aircraft’s movements. When he attempted to intercept it, the object rapidly accelerated and disappeared “like nothing I’ve ever seen,” in Fravor’s words.
4. Descent to Sea Level: After the object disappeared, Fravor and Slaight descended to investigate the disturbance in the water, but it had disappeared by the time they arrived.
5. Radar Contact: Upon returning to the USS Nimitz, Fravor was informed that the object had been picked up on radar at their predetermined rendezvous point, about 60 miles away, mere moments after it had disappeared from his visual contact.

Fravor has consistently maintained his account in numerous interviews and official statements since the incident became public. He emphasizes the extraordinary nature of the object’s flight characteristics, stating that it demonstrated capabilities far beyond any known aircraft technology.

Lieutenant Commander Jim Slaight

Lieutenant Commander Jim Slaight was Fravor’s wingman during the encounter. While he has been less public about his experience than Fravor, his account corroborates key aspects of Fravor’s testimony:

1. Confirmation of Sighting: Slaight confirmed seeing the unusual disturbance in the water and the white, oblong object above it.
2. Object’s Movements: He also observed the object’s rapid acceleration and disappearance.
3. Radar Anomalies: Slaight has discussed the unusual radar tracks that were being detected by the Princeton in the days leading up to and following their visual encounter.

Senior Chief Kevin Day

Senior Chief Operations Specialist Kevin Day was responsible for the air defense systems aboard the USS Princeton. His testimony provides crucial context for the radar detections that preceded and accompanied the visual sightings:

1. Initial Detections: Day reported that for about two weeks prior to the main incident, the Princeton’s radar had been detecting unusual aerial objects.
2. Flight Characteristics: These objects would appear at altitudes above 80,000 feet and descend rapidly to about 20,000 feet, where they would hover before either dropping off radar or shooting back up to high altitudes.
3. Multiple Contacts: Day recalls tracking multiple objects simultaneously, sometimes in groups of 10 or more.
4. Decision to Investigate: It was Day who ultimately made the decision to vector in fighter aircraft to investigate the contacts, leading to Fravor and Slaight’s encounter.
5. Continued Activity: Day has stated that the unusual radar tracks continued for several days after the initial visual sighting.

Lieutenant Chad Underwood

Lieutenant Chad Underwood was the pilot who captured the infamous “FLIR1” video, which was later released to the public in 2017. His account adds another layer to the incident:

1. FLIR Video: Underwood was able to capture infrared footage of an object using his aircraft’s ATFLIR pod. This video shows an oblong object performing unusual maneuvers.
2. Radar Lock: Underwood reported difficulty maintaining a radar lock on the object due to its rapid and erratic movements.
3. Visual Confirmation: While Underwood did not visually see the object with his own eyes, he was able to track it on his radar and infrared systems.

Other Witnesses

Several other crew members from both the USS Nimitz and USS Princeton have come forward with supporting accounts:

1. Gary Voorhis: A Petty Officer on the Princeton, Voorhis reported seeing strange lights in the sky and was involved in securing radar data from the encounters.
2. Jason Turner: An Operations Specialist aboard the Princeton, Turner corroborated accounts of the radar tracks and the general buzz of excitement among the crew during the incidents.
3. Anonymous Witnesses: Several other crew members have provided accounts anonymously, further supporting the main witnesses’ testimonies.

The consistency across these various accounts, coming from highly trained military personnel with different areas of expertise, adds significant weight to the Nimitz Encounter. Their combined testimonies paint a picture of an event that defies conventional explanation and challenges our understanding of aerial phenomena.

Key points:

• Commander David Fravor provides the primary eyewitness account of a close encounter with the “Tic Tac” object
• Lieutenant Commander Jim Slaight corroborates Fravor’s account
• Senior Chief Kevin Day provides crucial testimony about radar detections before and after the visual sightings
• Lieutenant Chad Underwood captured the “FLIR1” video that was later released to the public
• Multiple other witnesses from both ships support the main accounts, adding credibility to the overall incident

Technical Data and Recordings

The Nimitz Encounter is particularly significant due to the variety and quality of technical data collected during the incident. This data comes from multiple sophisticated sensor systems and includes radar readings, infrared video footage, and electronic signal detections.

A. FLIR (Forward Looking Infrared) Video Footage

The most publicly recognized piece of evidence from the Nimitz Encounter is the FLIR video, often referred to as the “FLIR1” or “Tic Tac” video:

1. Recording Details: The video was captured by an F/A-18F Super Hornet using its Advanced Targeting Forward-Looking Infrared (ATFLIR) pod.
2. Content: The footage shows an oblong object moving at high speeds and performing maneuvers that appear to defy conventional aerodynamics.
3. Analysis: Expert analysis of the video has noted several anomalous characteristics:
   • The object lacks any visible means of propulsion.
   • It demonstrates the ability to rotate instantly without losing momentum.
   • The object’s heat signature is unlike that of conventional aircraft.
4. Authenticity: The U.S. Navy has officially acknowledged the authenticity of this video.

B. Radar Data from Ships and Aircraft

Multiple radar systems tracked the UAPs during the Nimitz Encounter:

1. SPY-1 Radar: The USS Princeton’s advanced SPY-1 radar system detected objects performing extraordinary maneuvers:
   • Rapid altitude changes from above 80,000 feet to sea level in seconds.
   • Speeds far exceeding known aircraft capabilities.
   • The ability to hover and then accelerate instantly.
2. Aircraft Radar: Both the E-2C Hawkeye (airborne early warning aircraft) and F/A-18 fighters detected the objects on their radar systems.
3. Consistency: The radar data corroborated visual sightings and FLIR recordings, providing multi-sensor confirmation of the anomalous objects.

C. Analysis of the “Tic Tac” Object’s Reported Capabilities

Based on witness accounts and sensor data, the UAP demonstrated capabilities far beyond known technology:

1. Speed: Witnesses and radar data suggest speeds potentially exceeding Mach 60 (approximately 46,000 mph).
2. Acceleration: The object could allegedly accelerate from hover to hypersonic speeds almost instantaneously.
3. Maneuverability: It demonstrated the ability to make instant course corrections without deceleration.
4. Altitude Range: The object was tracked moving from sea level to above 80,000 feet rapidly.
5. Stealth: Despite its extraordinary performance, the object had no visible engine or exhaust plume.
6. Trans-medium Travel: Some accounts suggest the object could transition between air and water.

Key points:

• The Nimitz Encounter is supported by multiple forms of technical data, including FLIR video and radar readings
• The FLIR video shows an object performing anomalous maneuvers
• Radar data from multiple sources corroborated the extraordinary capabilities of the objects
• The reported capabilities of the UAP far exceed known aircraft technology

Official Navy Response and Investigations

The official response to the Nimitz Encounter has evolved significantly over time, moving from initial dismissal to acknowledgment and serious investigation.

A. Initial Reactions and Reports

1. Immediate Response: Initially, the encounters were treated with a mix of curiosity and confusion by those involved.
2. Incident Reports: Official reports were filed by the pilots and radar operators involved in the encounters.
3. Data Confiscation: Some witnesses reported that shortly after the incidents, unknown individuals came aboard the ships and confiscated certain data recordings and logs.

B. Subsequent Investigations and Studies

1. AATIP Involvement: The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), a secret Pentagon program running from 2007 to 2012, reportedly investigated the Nimitz Encounter as part of its study of UAPs.
2. SCU Report: The Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU) conducted an in-depth analysis of the Nimitz Encounter, publishing a comprehensive report in 2019.
3. Navy Task Force: In 2020, the U.S. Navy established a UAP Task Force to investigate encounters like the Nimitz incident.

C. Navy’s Acknowledgment and Policy Changes Regarding UAP Reporting

1. Video Authentication: In 2019, the U.S. Navy officially acknowledged the authenticity of the FLIR1 video and two other UAP videos.
2. New Reporting Guidelines: In 2019, the Navy implemented new guidelines for reporting UAP encounters, acknowledging the need for systematic data collection on these phenomena.
3. Congressional Briefings: Navy officials have provided classified briefings to members of Congress about UAP encounters, including the Nimitz incident.
4. Public Statements: While maintaining a cautious stance, Navy spokespersons have publicly acknowledged the reality and seriousness of UAP encounters.

Key points:

• Initial official response to the Nimitz Encounter was mixed, with some reports of data confiscation
• Subsequent investigations have been conducted by both government and civilian organizations
• The U.S. Navy has officially acknowledged the authenticity of the FLIR video
• New policies have been implemented for reporting and investigating UAP encounters

Public Disclosure and Media Coverage

The Nimitz Encounter remained largely unknown to the public for over a decade before becoming one of the most widely discussed UAP incidents in recent history.

A. Initial Leaks and Reports (2017)

1. To The Stars Academy: In 2017, To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science, an organization co-founded by former Blink-182 musician Tom DeLonge, released the FLIR1 video.
2. Online Forums: Prior to the official release, some details of the encounter had been discussed in online UFO forums, but these discussions were limited in reach.

B. New York Times Article (December 2017)

1. Breakthrough Report: On December 16, 2017, the New York Times published an article titled “Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’: The Pentagon’s Mysterious U.F.O. Program,” which brought the Nimitz Encounter to widespread public attention.
2. Content: The article revealed the existence of AATIP, discussed the Nimitz Encounter, and included the FLIR1 video.
3. Impact: This report legitimized the discussion of UAPs in mainstream media and sparked intense public interest.

C. Subsequent Media Coverage and Public Interest

1. Major News Outlets: Following the New York Times article, numerous major news organizations covered the story, including CNN, Fox News, and ABC.
2. Documentaries: Several documentaries have been produced about the incident, including episodes on History Channel’s “Unidentified: Inside America’s UFO Investigation.”
3. Witness Interviews: Key witnesses like David Fravor have given numerous interviews to media outlets and podcasts, keeping the story in the public eye.
4. Scientific Discussion: The incident has been discussed in scientific forums and publications, elevating the discourse around UAPs.
5. Social Media: The Nimitz Encounter has been widely discussed on social media platforms, contributing to its viral spread and ongoing public interest.
6. Government Acknowledgment: Subsequent acknowledgments by the U.S. Navy and Department of Defense have fueled continued media coverage and public discussion.

Key points:

• The Nimitz Encounter became widely known to the public in 2017 with the release of the FLIR1 video
• A New York Times article in December 2017 brought the incident to mainstream attention
• Subsequent media coverage has been extensive, including news reports, documentaries, and witness interviews
• The incident has sparked widespread public interest and discussion, both in traditional media and on social platforms

Scientific Analysis and Expert Opinions

The Nimitz Encounter has been subject to extensive scientific analysis and expert review, given its extraordinary nature and the quality of available data.

1. FLIR Video Analysis:
   • Several experts in image analysis have examined the FLIR1 video, confirming its authenticity and the anomalous nature of the object’s movements.
   • Mick West, a noted skeptic, has proposed that the object could be a distant aircraft, though this explanation is contested by other analysts and the pilots involved.
2. Radar Data Interpretations:
   • Radar experts have noted that the reported movements of the UAPs are inconsistent with known aircraft capabilities or natural phenomena.
   • Some analysts have suggested that the radar returns could be the result of equipment malfunction or atmospheric effects, though this doesn’t account for the corroborating visual sightings.
3. Scientific Papers:
   • Dr. Kevin Knuth, a former NASA research scientist, published a paper in 2019 analyzing the physics of the reported UAP movements, concluding that they demonstrate technology far beyond current capabilities.
4. SCU Report:
   • The Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies released a comprehensive 270-page report on the Nimitz Encounter, providing detailed analysis of all available data.

Key points:

• Expert analysis has largely confirmed the anomalous nature of the encountered phenomena
• Some skeptical explanations have been proposed but are generally considered insufficient to explain all aspects of the encounter
• Scientific papers have been published analyzing the physics of the reported UAP movements

Impact on UFO Research and Military Protocols

The Nimitz Encounter has had a profound impact on both UFO research methodologies and military protocols for dealing with UAPs.

1. UFO Research:
   • The incident has set a new standard for the quality of evidence in UFO cases, emphasizing the importance of multiple sensor data and credible witnesses.
   • It has sparked renewed interest in the scientific study of UAPs, with more academics and institutions willing to engage with the subject.
2. Military Protocols:
   • In 2019, the U.S. Navy implemented new guidelines for reporting UAP encounters, streamlining the process and reducing stigma.
   • The incident has led to increased cooperation between different branches of the military in tracking and analyzing UAP reports.
3. Government Investigations:
   • The Nimitz Encounter played a key role in the establishment of the UAP Task Force by the Department of Defense in 2020.
   • It has been a central case in briefings to Congress, influencing policy decisions regarding UAP investigations.

Key points:

• The incident has elevated the standards for evidence in UFO research
• It has led to changes in military protocols for reporting and investigating UAPs
• The encounter has influenced the establishment of official government UAP investigation programs

Theories and Interpretations

Various theories have been proposed to explain the Nimitz Encounter, ranging from exotic to mundane:

1. Extraterrestrial Hypothesis:
   • Some researchers suggest that the observed capabilities indicate technology of non-human origin.
2. Advanced Earthly Technology:
   • Theories propose that the UAPs could be secret U.S. or foreign technology being tested.
3. Natural Phenomena:
   • Some skeptics argue that the encounters could be explained by rare atmospheric phenomena or misidentified conventional objects.
4. Interdimensional or Time Travel Hypotheses:
   • More speculative theories suggest the possibility of objects from other dimensions or future time periods.
5. Psychological and Perceptual Explanations:
   • Some analysts propose that the encounters could be the result of misperception or equipment malfunction, though this struggles to account for all the collected data.

Key points:

• Theories range from extraterrestrial visitation to advanced secret technology
• Natural phenomena and psychological explanations have been proposed but struggle to account for all aspects of the encounter
• The variety of theories reflects the truly anomalous nature of the incident

Legacy and Continuing Relevance

The Nimitz Encounter continues to have a significant impact on UAP discourse and policy:

1. Ongoing Investigations:
   • The incident remains a focus of both government and civilian research into UAPs.
   • It continues to be referenced in official discussions about UAP phenomena.
2. Public Awareness:
   • The encounter has significantly raised public awareness and acceptance of UAP phenomena.
   • It has sparked renewed interest in scientific and rational approaches to studying unexplained aerial phenomena.
3. Policy Influence:
   • The incident has played a role in shaping new policies for UAP reporting and investigation in the U.S. military.
   • It has influenced congressional interest in UAP phenomena, leading to mandated reports and increased transparency.
4. Ongoing Debates:
   • The Nimitz Encounter continues to be a subject of debate among scientists, researchers, and skeptics, driving forward the conversation about unexplained aerial phenomena.

Key points:

• The Nimitz Encounter remains a focal point for ongoing UAP investigations
• It has significantly influenced public awareness and acceptance of UAP phenomena
• The incident continues to shape military and government policies regarding UAPs
• It remains a subject of ongoing scientific and public debate

Conclusion

The 2004 Nimitz Encounter is undoubtedly one of the most significant and well-documented UAP incidents in modern history. Its combination of credible witnesses, multiple sensor data, and official acknowledgment has elevated it to a pivotal position in the study of unexplained aerial phenomena.

This incident has challenged our understanding of aerospace capabilities and has forced both military and scientific communities to reconsider their approaches to unexplained phenomena in our skies. It has played a crucial role in destigmatizing UAP reporting and has brought the subject into mainstream scientific and political discourse.

As we continue to grapple with the implications of the Nimitz Encounter, it serves as a reminder of the importance of open-minded, rigorous investigation into phenomena that challenge our current understanding of the world. Whether the true explanation lies in undiscovered natural phenomena, advanced technology, or something even more exotic, the incident underscores the vast amounts we have yet to learn about our universe.

The legacy of the Nimitz Encounter will likely continue to influence UAP research, military protocols, and public discourse for years to come. It stands as a testament to the importance of continued scientific inquiry and the need for transparent, thorough investigation of unexplained phenomena.

Key points:

• The Nimitz Encounter is a landmark case in UAP history due to its strong evidence and credible witnesses
• It has significantly influenced military protocols, scientific research, and public perception of UAPs
• The incident continues to challenge our understanding and spark ongoing investigations
• It underscores the importance of open-minded, rigorous scientific inquiry into unexplained phenomena

For more amazing UFO encounter stories and accounts, check out UFO Resource!

References and Further Reading

1. Fravor, D., & Graves, R. (2020). “The Nimitz Encounters.” History Channel. Official Website
2. Cooper, H., Blumenthal, R., & Kean, L. (2017). “Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’: The Pentagon’s Mysterious U.F.O. Program.” The New York Times. NYT Article
3. Knuth, K. H., Powell, R. M., & Reali, P. A. (2019). “Estimating flight characteristics of anomalous unidentified aerial vehicles.” Entropy, 21(10), 939. MDPI Article
4. Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (2019). “A Forensic Analysis of Navy Carrier Strike Group Eleven’s Encounter with an Anomalous Aerial Vehicle.” SCU Report
5. U.S. Department of Defense (2020). “Establishment of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force.” DoD News
6. Rogoway, T. (2019). “What The Hell Is Going On With UFOs And The Department Of Defense?” The Drive. The Drive Article
7. West, M. (2020). “Nimitz Encounter: A Forensic Analysis.” Metabunk. Metabunk Analysis
8. Powell, R., et al. (2018). “A Forensic Analysis of Navy Carrier Strike Group Eleven’s Encounter with an Anomalous Aerial Vehicle.” NARCAP. NARCAP Report
9. Day, K. (2019). “The Nimitz Encounters.” Documentary. Official Website
10. Greenwald, G. (2019). “Interview with Luis Elizondo, Former Head of Pentagon UFO Program.” The Intercept. The Intercept Interview